Share
22nd June 2021
09:49pm BST
For context, earlier this month, Hungary's far-right government led by Victor Orban introduced new anti-LGBTQ+ laws which would prevent any teaching about same-sex relationships in schools, and stop queer content from being shown on TV aimed towards kids.
Compared to Russia's 2013 'gay propaganda' law, it was passed by 157 votes to one and is the latest in the ruling party's assault on the country's LGBTQ community.
That law, Human Rights Watch says, has had a "stifling effect on access to affirming education and support services, with harmful consequences for LGBT youth".
Anyone who pays even the slightest bit of attention to football's governing bodies and the way they operate is aware that they have always attempted to have their feet in the camps of both progressivism and traditionalism.
This is a byproduct of attempting to grow the game outside of Europe, as part of football's manifest destiny to continually find and expand within emerging markets across the world.
They must cater to audiences in countries with progressive and actually equal laws for LGBTQ+ people, while also attempting not to alienate audiences in countries where rights are limited, or even non-existent.
It is immoral, there's no question about that. But Uefa and FIFA have always been immoral.
Most of the time, though, it is not quite as brazen as it has been in relation to their decision on Tuesday morning to prevent the Allianz from being lit up as a gesture of support to queer people around the world.
Uefa briefly showed their true colours on Sunday, when it was revealed that they had initiated an investigation into the German football federation (DFB) and goalkeeper Manuel Neuer, over his decision to wear a rainbow captain's armband during his nation's match against Portugal.
They quickly stopped the investigation, presumably sensing the tidal wave of criticism that was on its way, but less than a day later, are at it again.
Make no mistake, the impact of their decision could be far-reaching, and shows the impossibility of 'playing both sides' when it comes to an issue as black and white as the right to live one's life as you wish, and to love who you love without fear of persecution from authorities.
If Uefa deemed the proposed rainbow display as political, then what do they make of the displays from some Hungary fans during their opening game against Portugal, when banners celebrating the anti-LGBTQ+ laws were unfurled?
What, one wonders, does Uefa make of the wall of black t-shirts seen at every game in Budapest - black t-shirts commonly associated with the Carpathian Brigade; a group of hooligans who regularly chant racist, homophobic and sexist diatribe before games and from the stands?
https://twitter.com/Millar_Colin/status/1406236012385341441?s=20
Uefa turns a blind eye to much of this under the guise of being an apolitical organisation, all while its president gets cozy with the man who is the current figure head of this wave of thinking in the country, Viktor Orban.
The organisation's desire to "tackle discrimination", it seems, only pertains to hypothetical situations, or only involves nations whose federations Čeferin doesn't feel the need to keep onside.
How else can you explain Uefa's decisions to award Budapest quite so many Euros games at a time of enormous clampdowns on civil liberties? How else can you rationalise the Ferenc Puskas stadium being handed 2023's Europa League final?
For many, one suspects, this latest abandonment of their supposed progressive ideals will be a looking glass moment when it comes to UEFA.
The desire to show support for marginalised peoples at a time when their few rights are being restricted is not a political act, but to prevent it is.
For all their talk of equality and an 'equal game', Uefa has chosen to take sides with an openly, and brazen, far-right government.
It's a betrayal that should not be forgotten.
Explore more on these topics:
