
Share
30th June 2017
03:13pm BST

"The idea was for the two of them to put shape on the game when they came in but I thought they lost shape. It didn't look like players were on the same wave-length. That's not necessarily the fault of Farrell or Sexton but it looked to be that... usually when you have two ball players, you have an idea of where you want to go, three or four phases ahead of everything. "You know, for example, in five phases you want to be here and you'll have the front row ahead of you so you'll try to manipulate them. But I think that when they came the last day, because of the pressure New Zealand had exerted in the first 50 minutes, a lot of the Lions players were fatigued and not running good lines. There were not many passing avenues for the two lads. "The one crucial element is that both of them are distributors. Neither are go to the line and go through the gap men either. Contrast that with Beauden Barrett and the speed of him... and his capacity to play what's in front of him and offload."
O'Gara believes the fact that the Lions pack was on the back foot for long stretches of the First Test helped neither Farrell or Sexton, when he came on. Conor Murray suffered too and, box-kicks aside, did not show too much of an attacking threat.
"It's very hard to have a big tactical influence on the game when, even for a 10, he looked like an outsider," O'Gara said. He also raised an interesting topic about Gatland perhaps being convinced to go Sexton-Farrell by his assistant coaches Graham Rowntree and Andy Farrell.
"I think Gatland would have gone for Te'o. All day. "It would have been interesting to know exactly what happened in that selection meeting. Is Warren handing over the baton?... It'll be interesting to see the body language between the [Lions] coaches on Saturday."Warren Gatland and all-guns-blazing rugby. Must have been some meeting alright.
Explore more on these topics: