
Share
13th May 2019
05:13pm BST

"You'd probably just stop the game there and go in at half-time but we probably thought we'd go up in the air, challenge and maybe get a penalty out of the game and go in 13-3 possibly. "But to give away a penalty at that ruck was fairly crucial and then their score at half-time was tough to take; especially when we had a good bit of the momentum in the first-half. They're a class outfit and they took their chance."Leinster captain Johnny Sexton echoed those comments, and supported his half-back partner, after the game but McGrath has taken some criticism since the final. On Baz & Andrew's House of Rugby, Barry Murphy argued [from 8:30 below] that McGrath should have played to the match situation and kicked for touch. Andrew Trimble, his co-host, was adamant that the Leinster No.9 did the right thing. [caption id="attachment_200991" align="aligncenter" width="800"]
Luke McGrath pictured during the Heineken Champions Cup Final match between Leinster and Saracens at St James' Park. (Photo by Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile)[/caption]
Going back to that moment, after the first half clock had ticked past 40:00, McGrath put up a steepler as Billy Vunipola was in the back-field. It was hoped, by Leinster, that Rob Kearney would get to the ball ahead of the big No.8.
As it turned out, Vunipola jumped and caught the ball and fended the on-rushing Kearney. He then crashed onto the fullback and Kearney was unable to roll away from the breakdown. Sarries won a penalty, kicked for touch, won the resulting lineout and, within 90 seconds, were scoring through Maitland.
"I think too much is being made of that moment," said Andrew Trimble.
"If you've got Kearney chasing that, and you've got the chance of a contestable [high ball], which is slightly more than 50/50 when Kearney is under it... if you forget about what happened afterwards and just look at what happened there and then, why would they not play? Absolutely, 100% you play. "They've got a seven-point lead... the lead almost doesn't come into it as there is so much to be played. You definitely play there. You have a chance of getting the ball back at the Saracens 22 and maybe picking up another three points."https://twitter.com/patmccarry/status/1127598717199114241 "As you said, they had to work so hard for everything in this game," Murphy responded. "To go in 10-3 up at half-time was a massive achievement for them, in my opinion. But look, hindsight is everything but I just think that was a huge point, and a huge turning point in the game. Such a shift of momentum for Saracens." Upon hearing me, as producer, side with Murphy, Trimble fired back. Here is how it played out:
ANDREW: Lads! Honestly... honestly, wise up! Why on earth would you kick it out? This doesn't make any sense. PAT: Because it's a cup final! And you're 10-3 up. ANDREW: Yeah, and you've got a greater opportunity of attacking Saracens. They didn't get that many opportunities. Why would you kick it out?! BARRY: I don't, I don't think it was... don't think they were in as strong a position as you say they are. I think they'd gone backwards a little bit... they had gone back a bit. It wasn't as if they were in a good position to put pressure on Saracens.Just as it seemed as if Trimble was wavering, he steadied himself and argued that, all day, he would put his best chaser up against an opposition No.8 with a contestable. The issue, for Trimble, McGrath and Leinster, is that the No.8 was the world-class Vunipola.

Explore more on these topics: