
GAA
Share
Published 11:56 17 Mar 2022 GMT
Explore more on these topics:
“Last weekend, players took a stand that we would not engage in match-day media activity around games,” O’Hanlon wrote. “It was a small gesture to highlight player frustration over the ongoing issues around squad charters. It had minimal impact on fans, if any."The GAA’s response was to unilaterally, without the agreement of players, try to impose a squad charter on their terms. “The GAA have designed this charter, by their account, with player welfare in mind. Again, let’s be clear on this. Last December through to March, the GAA came to the negotiating table wanting to retain the cost-saving measures players had agreed to during the Covid crisis.
"Now, however, language around player welfare had been conveniently added in. At the time, the GAA negotiating team put forward a case that 50 cent per mile for 3 sessions a week and a cap of 32 players was all they could afford. "Two months later, they posted a profit for 2021 of €13.5 million. Was that an honest way to negotiate?”The most recent charter put forward by the GAA allows for four collective sessions a week at a rate of 65c per mile with any further gatherings to be paid at a rate negotiated at local level.
“The GAA are now willing to cover four sessions per week at 65c. That came about because last week the GPA let them know we would be communicating with all players."Three sessions were then moved to four over the course of 24 hours. Surely if player welfare was the concern here such a move, adding 33% to a training load, would be unthinkable. “Following on from that, the GAA now want to enforce a charter where 4 sessions are agreed at 65c per mile and then anything above that will need to be negotiated locally by players with county boards.
"In other words, county boards can allow as many sessions as they want – the GAA would be openly allowing unlimited training, but players would be financially penalised because the GAA accept a reduced mileage rate for sessions above 4.”“Players are still open and willing to go back to the negotiating table based on the above. It would be fair, based on expertise and would likely not cost the GAA anything more than what they are trying to impose. “The key difference – players would not be used by the GAA as a cost control measure. If they actually have player welfare in mind, then it’s a no-brainer to use a Contact Hours Policy.”
Touching moment as kids of Mayo boss help him with RTÉ interview after semi-final win
What a showing! Mayo produced a complete performance to comfortably put away a spirited Louth side, 3-23 to 0-15, and book their place in the All-Ireland final against either Dublin or Kerry. The forward line were on fire, with Ryan O’Donoghue winning a deserved man of the match, while Kobe McDonald rose to the occasion […]
GAA
1 day ago
RTÉ panel call for major rule change after black card controversy for Clare
This needs to happen! The major talking point after Clare’s loss to Limerick in their All-Ireland SHC semi-final, was the decision not to give goalkeeper Nicky Quaid a black card for taking out Peter Duggan. The Clare man was through on goal and scooped the ball over Quaid, before being tripped. However, the referee argued […]
GAA
1 week ago
GAA
Galway boss heaps praise on Dubs fans after loss for Paul Clancy tribute
GAA