Share
30th December 2020
05:26pm GMT
At first, the astonishing aspect about what Leeds did is how poorly the room was read here. They love to see themselves as a big club - which they are - and as outsiders, an attitude which may have led to the tweet being composed and sent in the first place.
But one look at Twitter would’ve told the person on tweeting duties that, after the result, all the goodwill was with them.
Fans and neutrals alike were rightfully mocking the commentary of the past week, and celebrating the fact that Marcelo Bielsa’s expansive style had - in the space of less than seven days - defeated the turgid styles of Sean Dyche and Big Sam.
https://twitter.com/FootballJOE/status/1343244946967584775?s=20
To do away with all this goodwill for a cheap, targeted shot is at best short-sighted and, at worst, provides another example of the blind tribalism of modern football, where criticism of your team in any form must be taken on, must require a response.
This happens all the time with fans, so much so we expect it, even if we wish it wasn’t the case. But for a club to engage in this is, to put it politely, deeply irresponsible.
Clearly, though, the real story here is the abuse of women within football, and the targeted abuse received by Carney in the aftermath of the tweet. As many as 4,000 replies were sent to Leeds’ tweet, many of which had the classic sexist remark that troglodytes love to roll out: get back in the kitchen.
When male pundits fuck up and say something stupid - and they do this so much each week it’s almost impossible to keep track - they receive some abuse, but none of that abuse is related to the fact that they are men.
A piece by Martin Ziegler in The Times today reports that Leeds have contacted Carney, and that staff at the club were surprised by the abuse she was subjected to.
That, quite simply, is scarcely believable, and if true probably means that the club need to hire people more adept with how the social media sphere, and the interactions within it, actually work.
https://twitter.com/LucyZelic/status/1344154101177700352?s=20
Most of us who use it are aware, even anecdotally, of the disproportionate abuse women in football receive on social media. A far from deep dive into Twitter when a female pundit is on the air is evidence of this.
To not take this fact into consideration before sending such a tweet is negligible. Far too many football fans require little to no encouragement to engage in this sort of behaviour and for them, a tweet such as that sent by Leeds last night is akin to a call to action.
https://twitter.com/NicoleHolliday/status/1344049929858244615?s=20
Mistakes happen, though, and the majority of people will agree that most of this could have been remedied with a quick deletion and apology.
The tapestry of Football Twitter is stitched with the ill-conceived tweets of social media interns. It is not new, and people move on.
Instead, for reasons beyond anyone’s comprehension, Leeds and its owner have doubled down, with Andrea Radrizzani claiming to take responsibility for the tweet.
The club have since condemned the abuse aimed at Carney, but more than 12 hours later the tweet remains live, and much of the damage has been done, to both Leeds and Carney.
The handling of all of this ensures that rather than talking about their brilliant football and inspired manager, we’re here discussing a football club who’ve decided to sacrifice all the goodwill they’ve garnered this season to take on one person.
It's a situation from which no one emerges a winner.Explore more on these topics:
